Archaeology Birds Carnivores Flora Macroinvertebrate Rangeland Ungulates

Managment plan

Home

 

 

 

4    Results

4.1   Observer coverage

4.2   Total number of species recorded per square

4.3   Breeding species and territories per square

4.4    Species abundance

4.5   Breeding bird assemblage

4.6   Migrant/Wintering Species

4.7   Raptor migration

4.8   Counterpart training

 

Results

During the survey a total of 119 species of bird was identified within the Protected Area. Additionally tracks of what are believed to be stone curlew were found in Khor Ram on 27 April. Based on the available literature (Andrews et al (1999), Andrews (1995), Evans and Amr (1996)  and Bradbury et al (1997)), 25 of these species were new to the Rum Desert area. Of particular note were pied wheatear – potentially a new species for Jordan; red-tailed wheatear (5th record for Jordan); wintering Cyprus warbler and desert warbler (both rare passage or wintering species);  and marsh warbler (potentially 3rd and 4th records for Jordan).

      Of the 119 species, 34 are confirmed or potential breeding species and 85 are migrant/wintering species.

      A total of 1,836 pairs/territory holding males was recorded. From this figure a theoretical total population of 1,800 to 3,118 pairs/territory holding males within the Protected Area can be estimated – see Summary of breeding bird populations below. Two species – hoopoe lark and great grey shrike – were found breeding for the first time.

Summary of breeding bird populations

Species

No. pairs/territory holding males recorded

Total estimated population

Short-toed eagle

1

2

Long-legged buzzard

6+

6+

Verreaux's eagle

1

1

Kestrel

11

10-15

Sooty falcon

3

3++

Chukar

10

10-15

Sand partridge

21

20-35

Rock dove

59

50-100

Laughing dove

13

10-20

Eagle owl

1+

1++

Little owl

2

2++

Hume's tawny owl

5

5++

Bar-tailed desert lark

110

100-200

Desert lark

476

470-800

Hoopoe lark

1

2

Temminck's horned lark

7

5-15

African rock martin

100

85-175

Yellow-vented bulbul

3

2-10

Blackstart

4

1-5

Desert wheatear

7

5-15

Mourning wheatear

122

120-210

Hooded wheatear

20

15-25

White-crowned black wheatear

267

250-440

Scrub warbler

192

190-320

Palestine sunbird

2

2-5

Great grey shrike

3

1-5

Brown-necked raven

31

25-55

Fan-tailed raven

1

1

Tristram's grackle

10

10-20

House sparrow

?

10-30

Spanish sparrow

?

5++

Trumpeter finch

205

200-340

Sinai rosefinch

99

90-170

House bunting

39

35-65

      Detailed information on each species is given in the Species Accounts (Appendix 1) which are arranged in three sections – Breeding Species, Migrant/Winter Visitors and Migrating Raptors. The Species Accounts contain the following information:

      (i) a summary of the species' published status in Jordan based on information in Andrews (1995) and Andrews et al (1999),

      (ii) brief details of the species' habitat requirements based on information in Beaman and Madge (1998) (breeding species only),

      (iii) observations made during this survey,

      (iv) where appropriate, comments on the survey's results in relation to the published literature – Cramp et al (1977-1988), Evans (1994), Snow and Perrins (1998)

      (v) where appropriate, maps indicating presence/absence (majority of species), breeding numbers and distribution (breeding species only) and indication of abundance (species recorded during timed survey visits only).

      Summary information highlighting the significant findings of the survey are given later in this section.

 

4.1    Observer coverage

As detailed in section 3 – Methods, the whole of the Protected Area was divided into 149, 2 x 2 km squares and survey visits were made to 90 of these at the rate of four per day. As the season progressed and daytime temperatures were higher earlier in the day, better results would have been obtained if only three or even two squares had been covered, in the coolest periods at the start and end of the day, but by then there was no flexibility available in the schedule for a coverage of anything less than four squares a day. Specific recording visits were also made to seven non-survey squares and casual observations were made in 19 of the remaining squares, giving reasonable coverage of 116 squares representing 78% of the whole site – see map 3 Observer coverage. If records of birds seen whilst simply driving through squares are also included, bird records were obtained from a total of 139 squares representing 93% coverage of the site. The squares receiving greatest coverage were those including and around the RSCN house in Rum village as these provided both a good variety of habitats and were easily accessible for 'opportunistic' recording outside the main survey periods.

 

4.2    Total number of species recorded per square

This is shown on map 4 Total number of species recorded in each square and five squares are highlighted as being of particular importance – three around Rum village (3474, 3272 and 3472), the area immediately north of Khazali (3468) and around the small jebels in the south-west corner of the Protected Area (2066). There are three possible reasons why more species were recorded in these squares: a) greater intensity of observer coverage; b) greater diversity of habitat; c) geographical location (squares situated on natural migration flyways). The relative importance of each of these factors is looked at in more detail in section 5 – Discussion.
 

4.3    Breeding species and territories per square

This is shown on map 5 Total number of breeding territories and breeding species recorded in each square where the black squares indicate the highest number of breeding species. However, this map includes all records and thus uneven observer coverage, so the relative importance of each square cannot be determined. By contrast, map 6 Abundance of breeding territories and breeding species in each square presents only the data collected during the standard two hour survey visits, allowing direct comparison between squares. Despite these differences, broadly the two maps present a similar picture. There are centres of higher species diversity (but note that even the most important squares support a maximum of only 11-13 species) and the number of species in each square increases with the increase in coverage. These  increases seem to radiate out from the centres of higher diversity defined on the abundance map (map 6) possibly indicating that the centres of species diversity are, in reality, larger than the abundance map indicates and that, given greater and equal coverage of the whole site, an even more uniform picture would emerge.

      As far as the number of breeding territories per square is concerned, there is no direct correlation with either observer coverage or the number of breeding species per square. Rather the maps reflect the suitability of the habitat, and thus abundance, of one or two species. For example trumpeter finch in square 2466, desert lark and white-crowned black wheatear in square 2468 and desert lark in square 3672 –  see map 6. The only exception to this is square 3264 where a good variety of species was found breeding in good numbers indicating an area of healthy and well structured habitat.

Next

Summary Introduction Objectives Methods
Results Discussion Recommendations Appendices